 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| Prof. Birbal Sahni |
|
Wide Scientific Interests |
Birbal's interests were wide
and his discovery of the coin moulds at Rohtak in
March 1936 bears witness. This archaeological
discovery by a palaeobotanist, with the stroke of
a geologist's hammer, symbolizes the vitality and
versatility of the man. It is a tribute to his
genius that not only did he make this unique
discovery, but also threw himself heart and soul
into the study of these coin moulds. He published
his results in a masterly monograph in the journal
of the Numismatic Society in 1945, setting,
according to a numismatist, a new standard of
research in the subject. For this purpose he set
himself to the study of some of the Indian coin
moulds as well as those from China. He took keen
interest in all geological problems, even those
that had no direct bearing upon his
palaeobotanical work. But it must be said that, if
one scratched him deep enough, one always found a
botanist in the core.
|
Apart from his scientific
interests, he was much inclined towards music and
he could play on the sitar and the
violin. He was also interested in drawing and
clay-modeling and he utilized opportunities,
whenever he was free from his other work, to visit
the Arts School, Luc know, for further
acquaintance with these arts. |
| Independent Outlook |
There was another aspect of
Birbal's attitude towards life which comes
forcibly to mind and which shows his independent
outlook and his love for the science to which he
remained devoted throughout life, and in which he
was subsequently to make a name for himself and
for his country. Father was one of those
disciplinarians from whom a mere suggestion was
usually enough to settle where the decision lay.
He and his friends had sometimes discussed what
career the sons were to follow. In the summer of
1911 came Birbal's turn to proceed to England for
higher studies. Birbal was asked to prepare for
his departure. There could not be much argument
about it, but I distinctly remember Birbal's
answer: that if it was an order, he would go, but
that if his own inclinations in the matter were to
be considered, he would take up a research career
in Botany, and nothing else. Though this
astonished father for a while, yet he consented,
for in spite of his strong disciplinarian
attitude, he gave perfect freedom of choice in
essential matters. Thus it was that Birbal took up
a career as a botanist. In this case, perhaps,
father's acquiescence was not so difficult, as he
had been himself always keen on research and,
indeed, after years of service as a professor of
chemistry, he went to Manchester where he carried
out investigations on radioactivity with Prof.
Ernest Rutherford, results of which were
subsequently published. Indeed, Birbal helped him
there in photographic and other incidental work
during the vacations, though he had himself to
take the Natural Science Tripos, Part II, in the
same year. It scarcely needs repetition that
father's example gave the incentive and
inspiration for research to all those around him,
and not only that; he inculcated a spirit of
fearless, shedding the lustre of freedom around
himself which played its own part in the
independence movement.
|
Although Birbal gained many
academic distinctions but he did not plan to seek
them. He invariably had an independent outlook
where such matters were concerned, irrespective of
consequences. Once during his B.Sc. examination of
the Punjab University sitting down the Botany
examination he found that question paper set was
an exact, or almost exact, replica of the paper
set at a previous examination. He thought that
such a question paper might give undue advantage
to some and an undue handicap others, and that, in
any case, it could not be a fair test of
knowledge. He got up, handing the (blank) answer
sheets to the invigilator against all persuasion,
walked out of the hall in protest. When came home
within less than half an hour of the commencement
of the examination and met father at the doorstep,
it was a worthy sight! The surprised parent could
not decide whether to show anger or laugh at
situation, such as even he as a professor of long
standing had never been faced with – a situation
comic enough, but, nevertheless, potentially
fraught with serious consequences for the
University was in no way bound to set a fresh
paper to please the impetuosity of a young
student. The matter went to the University
Syndicate. Birbal one the day, for it was decided
that no examiner could be so easy going or
disinterested as to pick up an earlier paper and
inflict it upon the students, almost to to. A fresh paper was set for him. This shows how
well he held the courage of convictions, where
even an older man might have been afraid to lose a
year so unnecessarily, being well able to answer
the questions set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|